Development is our most important issue

In my opinion, development is the single most important issue at stake in this council election. Because of that, I will be supporting Ernie Margetson for Mayor.

I have gotten to know Ernie well as a result of working together on several development-related issues over the last dozen years.

 First off, as an engineer who also studied architecture, Ernie has an in-depth understanding of infrastructure and planning.

Beyond that, he is an excellent listener who is respectful of others even when he disagrees, and who works to bring people together.

Finally, he’s a level-headed and prudent person who wants to “see the numbers” before he makes up his mind – a very good quality given the long-term implications of some of the development choices we face.

Treat Hull, Picton

Council Decision Irresonsible

Re: Council Says No to Water (News, September 2; and Strong Mayor Veto (News, September 11). Voting “NO” to a zero-cost framework that brings all relevant parties together to build a clear asset management plan and financial strategy is a deeply shortsighted decision.

A proper financial strategy allows the County to manage risk and plan for critical infrastructure, growth, affordable housing, and reliable water systems. Saying “NO” puts our municipality at risk of losing millions in existing government funds and jeopardizes future grants essential to our local infrastructure. 

During the September 8th Council meeting, industry professionals emphasized the urgent need for a master plan. Yet dissenting council members showed little interest and asked almost no questions, suggesting their minds were made up beforehand. 

Mayor Ferguson clearly articulated why this framework was necessary, and CAO Adam Goheen reiterated that Council retains full approval authority over all future budgets and project phases.

The eight councillors who voted “NO” are ignoring expert advice from both industry leaders and County staff. A decision born of confusion or reluctance to plan will leave future councils and residents to pay the price. Growth requires a clear strategy. This “NO” vote offers no solution at all.

Diane Cooper, picton

The Sam Grosso I Know

Re: Councillor Grosso’s Barn (Letters, September 17). After reading the recent letter concerning Sam Grosso, I felt there was another side of the story that deserved to be told.

I have worked alongside Sam on fundraising efforts in Prince Edward County, particularly supporting our local food banks. I have seen firsthand how much time and effort he puts into helping his community. He doesn’t just talk about giving back, he shows up, and he does it quietly, year after year, without looking for recognition.

Sam has organized events, donated his time, helped raise money and collected food, and supported local organizations and people who need a hand.

There is also some important context regarding the September 19 show mentioned in the recent letter. Sam had written confirmation from County staff that the show could be held outside. Instead, he chose to move the event to another venue because he felt amplified outdoor music could be disruptive to his neighbors. Rather than create that disturbance, he moved the show.

Of course, people are entitled to question and criticize their elected representatives. But I also believe people deserve to hear the whole story.

I’ve spent time beside Sam raising money and collecting food for people in this community. I’ve watched him give his time and energy to local causes — not just when there’s an election, but quietly, year after year.

That’s the Sam Grosso I know.

Whatever disagreements people may have with him, I hope we don’t lose sight of the good that people actually do for their community.

Conrad Guziewicz, Wellington